| 
		
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 1,538 
	Threads: 71 
	Joined: May 2021
	
 Reputation: 
168 Gimp version: 
 Operating system(s): Linux
	 
	
		
		
		06-13-2022, 03:28 AM 
(This post was last modified: 06-13-2022, 04:46 AM by PixLab.)
	
	 
		 (06-13-2022, 01:57 AM)Stephen Liu Wrote:  Now I have changed my decision, scanning past photos on smartphoto instead of their film negatives.  It'll save me lot of time. The quality of the digital photos is quite good.  No post-editing is required.  Please refers to attached photos captured by me in the past in Linz, Austria, no macros, only 1x1
 The fixture is very simple.  The plastic clips are for indexing. Please refers to attached photo
 
 Cropping can't be avoided.  Should I find those digital photos are of inferior quality then I'll scan their negatives.
 
 Regards
 
 Hi all,
 
 I'm running remote desktop to shoot photos remotely.
 
 My smartphone, Samsung Galaxy S9+, is connected to Ubuntu 20.04 desktop PC via an USB cable. It will charge the smartphone during capturing simultaneously.
 
 I just remote-control the smartphone on Ubuntu 20.04 display and keyboard.  After capturing, the digital file is immediately download to PC without saving on the smartphone.
 
 This arrangement is very efficient without creating un-necessary motion to the smartphone during capturing because I don't need touching the screen of the smartphone.
 
 Regards
 
Not only you are using day light instead of an artificial controlled light, but 1 corner is not leveled       
I won't speak about changing your mind so often, but in my opinion, if you had taken 1 way to do it and did stick to it from the beginning, you would have finished to scan them all and may be already post processed individually  (no bulk processing) a part of them as you already got some good tips from your first post, this set up was already proposed weeks ago, I just hope you won't change again...     
		
	 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 167 
	Threads: 26 
	Joined: May 2018
	
 Reputation: 
2 Gimp version: 
 Operating system(s): Linux
	 
	
		
		
		06-13-2022, 07:30 AM 
(This post was last modified: 06-13-2022, 07:34 AM by Stephen Liu.)
	
	 
		 (06-13-2022, 03:28 AM)PixLab Wrote:   (06-13-2022, 01:57 AM)Stephen Liu Wrote:  Now I have changed my decision, scanning past photos on smartphoto instead of their film negatives.  It'll save me lot of time. The quality of the digital photos is quite good.  No post-editing is required.  Please refers to attached photos captured by me in the past in Linz, Austria, no macros, only 1x1
 The fixture is very simple.  The plastic clips are for indexing. Please refers to attached photo
 
 Cropping can't be avoided.  Should I find those digital photos are of inferior quality then I'll scan their negatives.
 
 Regards
 
 Hi all,
 
 I'm running remote desktop to shoot photos remotely.
 
 My smartphone, Samsung Galaxy S9+, is connected to Ubuntu 20.04 desktop PC via an USB cable. It will charge the smartphone during capturing simultaneously.
 
 I just remote-control the smartphone on Ubuntu 20.04 display and keyboard.  After capturing, the digital file is immediately download to PC without saving on the smartphone.
 
 This arrangement is very efficient without creating un-necessary motion to the smartphone during capturing because I don't need touching the screen of the smartphone.
 
 Regards
 Not only you are using day light instead of an artificial controlled light, but 1 corner is not leveled
  
 
 
 I won't speak about changing your mind so often, but in my opinion, if you had taken 1 way to do it and did stick to it from the beginning, you would have finished to scan them all and may be already post processed individually (no bulk processing) a part of them as you already got some good tips from your first post, this set up was already proposed weeks ago, I just hope you won't change again...
  
Thanks for your advice and comment.  Sorry for about that.
 
This is my first time converting about 1,000 photos to digital files.  I don't expect going the wrong way, investigating all routes suitable for my application.
 
I need to care their future use, storage etc.  If selecting a wrong way, to do the second time would take a lengthy time.
 
Furthermore I can use LED light illumination.  I'll test it again to check the quality of the output image
 
Regards
	 
		
	 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 1,538 
	Threads: 71 
	Joined: May 2021
	
 Reputation: 
168 Gimp version: 
 Operating system(s): Linux
	 
	
		
		
		06-13-2022, 08:01 AM 
(This post was last modified: 06-13-2022, 08:04 AM by PixLab.)
	
	 
		 (06-13-2022, 07:30 AM)Stephen Liu Wrote:  Furthermore I can use LED light illumination.  I'll test it again to check the quality of the output image
 Regards
 
Put a light diffuser in front of the led, as it might be too harsh depending the power of your led, a simple white paper like an A4 or US letter paper for printer and some tape can do the job without investing money and if not enough, put 2 layers of papers with a centimeter in between    
		
	 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 167 
	Threads: 26 
	Joined: May 2018
	
 Reputation: 
2 Gimp version: 
 Operating system(s): Linux
	 
	
	
		 (06-13-2022, 08:01 AM)PixLab Wrote:   (06-13-2022, 07:30 AM)Stephen Liu Wrote:  Furthermore I can use LED light illumination.  I'll test it again to check the quality of the output image
 Regards
 Put a light diffuser in front of the led, as it might be too harsh depending the power of your led, a simple white paper like an A4 or US letter paper for printer and some tape can do the job without investing money and if not enough, put 2 layers of papers with a centimeter in between
  
Thanks.
 
In alternative I can use my Samsung Galaxy Tablet as light source.
 
In the past when I scanned film negatives with Samsung Galaxy Tablet as light box, it never made me disappointed
	 
		
	 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 7,777 
	Threads: 166 
	Joined: Oct 2016
	
 Reputation: 
1,069 Gimp version: 
 Operating system(s): Linux
	 
	
		
		
		06-13-2022, 09:28 AM 
(This post was last modified: 06-13-2022, 09:28 AM by rich2005.)
	
	 
		@Stephen Liu Quote:Now I have changed my decision, scanning past photos on smartphoto instead of their film negatives.  It'll save me lot of time. 
Probably a good decision. In 20 years of using Gimp I have never had the need to use the Gimp batch command line and the horrible script-fu language.
 
ImageMagick / XnView / more recently BIMP are the way I go.
	
		
	 |