03-26-2021, 11:10 PM
(03-26-2021, 12:45 PM)Ottia Tuota Wrote: The plugin does contain inaccuraces, that is unavoidable, and sometimes they may show. But I am glad you found better settings. I suspect that you first used the default algorithm=4, and then some higher number. Or perhaps you used algorithm=0 which is the slowest but best?
The choice algorithm=0 is best in that (1) it should be rather accurate, and (2) the number of control points should be low.
Thanks to the information given in post #1 I was able to envision a viable alternative.
After obtaining the result using the = 4 (default) algorithm and knowing that with the = 0 algorithm I should have a better quality at the expense of greater slowness, I tried this option and voilà.
Note: At least in this case, the slowness was not that great.
Thx.