04-25-2021, 05:44 PM
(This post was last modified: 04-25-2021, 07:43 PM by rickk.
Edit Reason: spelling
)
Just curious if any of you have personal preferences in one vs the other? I just tuned in to realizing that gimp can author Webp images, and that Webp is a more likely heir than animated PNG for web based animations.
From my initial exposure, the Webp seems to excel in not having such a limited palette, and I guess partial transparency, but unfortunately the common free image hosting sites that I normally use (imgur) does not support them?
For a 2 frame animation I just made using movie stills as source, the Webp export was twice the size of the GIF export.
Other impressions?
From my initial exposure, the Webp seems to excel in not having such a limited palette, and I guess partial transparency, but unfortunately the common free image hosting sites that I normally use (imgur) does not support them?
For a 2 frame animation I just made using movie stills as source, the Webp export was twice the size of the GIF export.
Other impressions?