06-23-2018, 05:00 PM
(06-23-2018, 01:40 PM)Espermaschine Wrote: I think my idea was to basically get rid of 'Background Fill' and 'Layer Name' (and perhaps 'Opacity' if a Layer Group is possible).
Add a 'Reverse Gradient Option'.
Change 'Layers' to 'Multiple' or 'Layer Group'.
Plus, it would be nice to improve on the confusion i had with the 'Generate Intermediate Paths' script and the z-order.
Just call it Top and Bottom path instead of Beginning and End.
That would make it more intuitive.
EDIT:
i was also able to replicate the bug i was experiencing
- Background fill is necessary in many cases (even if I could make transparency the default)
- Layer name maybe an unnecessary complexity
- A frequent use case of te script is animations. "Beginning" and "End" refer to the time flow in the animation, which is bottom to top in the layer stack. This is why layers/paths are generated in that order.
- Reverse gradient will be included
- Having the option to put the layers in a group is a good idea but I keep the other two options (Single and Multliple) because animations require the layers to be at the top level.
- Thanks for the bug report. Replicated and fixed. The code was setting the FG color for the fill before creating the layer, so if you want the layer background with the FG color you get the same color as what you are going to fill the selection with.