02-18-2019, 09:38 AM
Nice poster, sorry no real solution.
This a screenshot of one corner at 1600x scale. https://i.imgur.com/9V0Fpgu.jpg
Top one is via inkscape to show the path and the anti-aliasing.
Middle is importing the eps with no anti-aliasing. The ramping, the different density anti-aliasing is gone, flattened never to return and the shape lost.
Bottom is some edge work with a gaussian blur, but never going to be wonderful.
However, it does also depend on intent. As imported at 7913x10000 pix, the print resolution is 480 pixels-per-inch (ppi) and the print size is 42x53 cm
To me, it looks like the intent might be printing 100x79cm @ 254 ppi (100 pixels-per-cm, often used by photo laser printers)
Might look ok without anti-aliasing, viewing distance for an art poster might be 2+ metres and 254 ppi is well in excess of requirement.
This a screenshot of one corner at 1600x scale. https://i.imgur.com/9V0Fpgu.jpg
Top one is via inkscape to show the path and the anti-aliasing.
Middle is importing the eps with no anti-aliasing. The ramping, the different density anti-aliasing is gone, flattened never to return and the shape lost.
Bottom is some edge work with a gaussian blur, but never going to be wonderful.
However, it does also depend on intent. As imported at 7913x10000 pix, the print resolution is 480 pixels-per-inch (ppi) and the print size is 42x53 cm
To me, it looks like the intent might be printing 100x79cm @ 254 ppi (100 pixels-per-cm, often used by photo laser printers)
Might look ok without anti-aliasing, viewing distance for an art poster might be 2+ metres and 254 ppi is well in excess of requirement.