| Welcome, Guest |
You have to register before you can post on our site.
|
| Latest Threads |
Problem posting an update...
Forum: Gimp-Forum.net
Last Post: Scallact
Yesterday, 10:19 PM
» Replies: 19
» Views: 940
|
Paint bucket acts "weird"
Forum: General questions
Last Post: PieterJW
Yesterday, 06:59 PM
» Replies: 7
» Views: 342
|
Install gimp user manual ...
Forum: Linux and other Unixen
Last Post: rich2005
Yesterday, 09:03 AM
» Replies: 1
» Views: 157
|
Why am'I fighting with GI...
Forum: Linux and other Unixen
Last Post: rich2005
Yesterday, 08:47 AM
» Replies: 1
» Views: 102
|
Very, very nice startup t...
Forum: General questions
Last Post: mrkid
12-18-2025, 04:37 PM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 175
|
Why does HTML/css scale i...
Forum: General questions
Last Post: Tas_mania
12-17-2025, 07:20 PM
» Replies: 1
» Views: 242
|
Path autocurves plugin (G...
Forum: Extending the GIMP
Last Post: InquisitiveAsHell
12-17-2025, 07:40 AM
» Replies: 6
» Views: 728
|
Transparent Background Ad...
Forum: General questions
Last Post: Kramskry
12-16-2025, 08:52 PM
» Replies: 2
» Views: 341
|
Inside drop shadow maybe?...
Forum: General questions
Last Post: denzjos
12-16-2025, 04:45 PM
» Replies: 2
» Views: 264
|
gexport: Make-like tool f...
Forum: Extending the GIMP
Last Post: JohnHammersley
12-16-2025, 03:42 PM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 162
|
|
|
| editing floating selections / alpha channel locked (2.10.32) |
|
Posted by: zach_D - 08-17-2022, 07:47 PM - Forum: General questions
- Replies (2)
|
 |
Recently switched to a newer version of GIMP (2.10.32) and finding that I am unable to edit floating selections without clicking on the alpha channel lock/unlock every time I want to make an edit to a floating selection.
Is there any way to turn this off this alpha channel lock (for floating selections) permanently?
Having to click it off manually every time I want to make an edit on a floating selection is clunky / highly annoying, compared to the ease and functionality of the previous version (2.8) that I was using.
Kinda assuming there's no way within the current 2.10.32 version to permanently turn off automatic alpha channel lock for floating selections,
is it possible to manipulate the coding itself to do this? I have no idea how to go about this....
|
|
|
| Reconstructing an image from overlapping parts |
|
Posted by: Ofnuts - 08-17-2022, 08:25 AM - Forum: Tutorials and tips
- Replies (2)
|
 |
Note: this method applies only to bigger images cut out properly (for instance, multiple screenshots of something too big to fit on a screen), not to picture extracts done with a handheld camera/smartphone that are in the realm of panorama software such as Hugin). This method can also give decent results with partial scans, but this assumes that there is very little distortion in the scanner, which isn't always a given.
- You temporarily set the layer at the top to Difference mode. This will show you outlines in both pics where they overlap. Yes, the top layer doesn't show in the areas where there is nothing below it.
- You move the top layer and and when the position is pixel-perfect the overlap goes completely black. In the last stages you can move the layer pixel-by-pixel using the cursor keys (or you can zoom in to some part of the image with many small details)
- You set the top layer back to Normal mode to restore the full image.
- Rinse and repeat for every layer.
|
|
|
| Clone (and dodge) problems |
|
Posted by: UserError - 08-16-2022, 02:23 PM - Forum: General questions
- Replies (1)
|
 |
Hello. I'm running Gimp 2.10 on Linux Mint 20. I have a standard AFAIK rgb jpg from my android phone. I am having trouble with the clone tool selecting a source. I have got it to sometimes, but mostly not. I don't know what I did to make it work, but it now won't work again.
I know about holding ctrl to select source, then releasing it. But it's not working and doesn't leave the source brush behind and sometimes leaves the error message to set a clone source - which disappears at some point (again, I can't make it go, not sure what the trigger is).
I am also having problems with the dodge/burn not toggling too.
I've used the clone tool loads before with no problems, but I'm an intermittent user but have been for many years.
I also previously installed the resynthesiser plugin - could this be linked?
If anyone could help, I'd appreciate it as I've used up a load of time getting nowhere.
Many thanks
|
|
|
| Scale image relative size? |
|
Posted by: BaconWizard17 - 08-14-2022, 02:46 PM - Forum: Scripting questions
- Replies (7)
|
 |
Hi all! I'm trying to work out a script that I can use to reduce the size of an image by half. However, I need this to work with images of different sizes, but I always want them to be scaled to half their size. I know that this code exists:
Code:
(gimp-image-scale image X Y)
But I've only ever used it for absolute sizes. How can I make it be relative? I'm assuming I'll need to get the current size of the image and then multiply those variables by 0.5, then use the variables in this command, but I'm having trouble finding any documentation about actually getting the layer sizes. Any help is appreciated!
|
|
|
| Inserting something between foreground and background in an image |
|
Posted by: Ofnuts - 08-14-2022, 08:45 AM - Forum: Tutorials and tips
- No Replies
|
 |
It is sometimes needed to add an object in an image and make it look part of it by appearing behind foreground elements and in front of background elements. With the proper technique this isn't difficult:
- Add the object in a new layer
- Duplicate the image layer
- Move the copy above the object layer (which is sandwiched between the two images)
- Using a layer mask, erase the top image except where it is in the immediate vicinity of the object: you start by removing most of the image (big brush or bucket-fill with a selection), remove most of the rest with a small brush, and shave off the outline where needed with a soft brush.
- The only place where erasure should be accurate is where a foreground element intersects the inserted object
For instance:
In that specific case:
- The layer group is not strictly necessary. It is used for demo purposes so the group thumbnail shows the effect of the mask
- You can see how little of the "copy" you need
- The image a good example... cutting out the whole cat properly with all the hairs would have been a daunting task (1600 pixels of fuzziness). But here the only place where we need a sharp cut in on the ears, which are not fuzzy (200 pixels of sharpness), as shown by the red lines below:
|
|
|
|