Welcome, Guest |
You have to register before you can post on our site.
|
|
|
My GEGL Plugins for text styling |
Posted by: BeaverGEGLFreak - 02-20-2023, 05:59 PM - Forum: Extending the GIMP
- Replies (20)
|
|
A lot of you probably already know who I am. My name is Beaver and I make third party GEGL text styling plugins for Gimp. You can install my plugins by following instructions on https://github.com/LinuxBeaver or going to each filters Github release page and compiling and installing binaries.
https://github.com/LinuxBeaver
Windows
Code:
C:\Users<YOUR NAME>\AppData\Local\gegl-0.4\plug-ins
Linux
Code:
/home/(USERNAME)/.local/share/gegl-0.4/plug-ins
Linux Flatpak
Code:
/home/(USERNAME)/.var/app/org.gimp.GIMP/data/gegl-0.4/plug-ins
Create a plug-ins folder if it doesn't exist.
Have fun
|
|
|
Remove Lama Cleaner |
Posted by: meetdilip - 02-19-2023, 03:59 AM - Forum: Other graphics software
- Replies (15)
|
|
Hi, I installed Lama Cleaner using these commands in Ubuntu 22.04
Code:
pip install lama-cleaner
Code:
lama-cleaner --model=lama --device=cpu --port=8080
It took a lot of space than I imagined ( around 4GB, I guess ) and it is not waiting till I draw the mask completely. The result was not very satisfactory for me either. So I tried to save some space by removing it using
Code:
pip uninstall lama-cleaner
The command was executed immediately, but I see that the space is still gone. I tried to remove the cache using Bleachbit as root, but only 320 MB was removed.
Any chance I can completely remove Lama Cleaner and win back the space?
Thanks.
|
|
|
scaled image smaller, lost image clarity |
Posted by: sedmont - 02-18-2023, 08:29 PM - Forum: General questions
- Replies (2)
|
|
In Gimp is there a way to scale an image down without losing image clarity?
I have some images in various layers. I flattened them, then scaled the result down from 6.88 inches wide to 6.5 inches wide (with the height also scaling down automatically in proportion). But the image clarity on screen before scaling down was better than after scaling down.
Thanks for any assistance.
I think I see how, now. The problem was that when I scaled down, I did so by changing the image size directly, while the resolution (300 ppi) remained the same. So by reducing the size, i was also reducing the total number of pixels in the image. So instead, I changed the image size by increasing the resolution. By raising resolution from 300 ppi to 317, the image automatically shrank to 6.511 inches wide (in printing). Because the total number of pixels in the image remained the same, compressing more pixels into an inch, the total size of the image decreases. But you have the same number of pixels, so resolution is not lost. I think...
|
|
|
|