| Welcome, Guest |
You have to register before you can post on our site.
|
| Latest Threads |
Gimp 3.0.6-1 G'Mic-Qt ups...
Forum: General questions
Last Post: denzjos
1 hour ago
» Replies: 2
» Views: 66
|
Issue with cut selection
Forum: Installation and usage
Last Post: kmll
8 hours ago
» Replies: 2
» Views: 94
|
Colorized Layer Reverts t...
Forum: General questions
Last Post: Ofnuts
Yesterday, 09:27 PM
» Replies: 5
» Views: 338
|
How to get G'MIC within G...
Forum: General questions
Last Post: teapot
Yesterday, 08:04 PM
» Replies: 2
» Views: 234
|
Gimp 3.x scanner xsane pl...
Forum: Gimp 2.99 & Gimp 3.0
Last Post: Ofnuts
Yesterday, 08:36 AM
» Replies: 14
» Views: 11,548
|
Gimp 3.0 get Metadata wit...
Forum: Scripting questions
Last Post: Volker
11-09-2025, 06:19 PM
» Replies: 3
» Views: 267
|
Text Editor hardly ever w...
Forum: General questions
Last Post: Snacko
11-09-2025, 05:13 PM
» Replies: 4
» Views: 357
|
How to make image and mas...
Forum: Installation and usage
Last Post: Ofnuts
11-08-2025, 08:39 PM
» Replies: 5
» Views: 330
|
Multi window mode mode fa...
Forum: General questions
Last Post: teapot
11-07-2025, 01:40 PM
» Replies: 5
» Views: 463
|
Animation with only GIMP ...
Forum: Gallery
Last Post: Scut-51
11-06-2025, 11:49 AM
» Replies: 25
» Views: 23,078
|
|
|
| Print issue ? |
|
Posted by: Recrem - 05-25-2019, 06:12 PM - Forum: General questions
- Replies (12)
|
 |
Hi
I have recently scaled up an image produced with Gimp to print 83 x 50cm. I generally produce the image at 50 x 30cm but had a special request for a larger image.
I've printed at the smaller size and never noticed any problem.. haven't had any similar problem in ten years of producing and printing images.
I was surprised to find the printed image was larger on the left side than on the right by 3mm.
I went back and checked the digital image thinking the image must have been distorted by the "unified transform tool" and left short on the right side.. but found on checking that the image completely filled the 83 x 50 rectangle with no visible empty background ?
We have since printed the same image twice and it is still 3mm short on the right side.
I am not certain if this problem has originated in Gimp or via the printer software.. I sent the image to a printer as a jpeg and they checked it in PS before printing.
Are there any known issues with certain printers.. or image file formats ?
Has anyone encountered this issue before ?
And if they did how did they resolve it ?
Thanks in anticipation.
|
|
|
| Can a Custom Pencil Brush include Transparency? |
|
Posted by: pha3z - 05-21-2019, 07:24 PM - Forum: General questions
- Replies (9)
|
 |
I've created a custom brush of some grass blades. They are full color. Because they are so small (sub pixel), it's essential that they have transparency in order to blend properly when I paint them.
However, it appears that transparency is ignored when I use the brush with the Pencil tool. It works fine when I use the Brush tool. However, there's a problem with that.
The Brush tool appears to do some kind of subpixel sampling in an attempt to make a brush appear to be centered exactly where you click. This means if you created a brush image that needs to be stamped so that exact per-pixel detail matches the brush as it was originally created, you can't. It gets distorted along the edges. Sometimes, the distortion is quite significant.
On the other hand, the pencil tool acts like an exact pixel-per-pixel map that "stamps" the exact brush shape without any distortion or alteration. I need the exact pencil mapping, but it appears to ignore transparency in the brush image.
Is there a configuration setting I'm missing?
|
|
|
| How do you make a ring thinner? |
|
Posted by: Hoot - 05-20-2019, 06:26 AM - Forum: General questions
- Replies (3)
|
 |
Greetings.
Seems like a basic function and run into it a lot but haven't found a tutorial yet. Basically, I want to make a ringed object thinner so it doesn't lose its size, just needs to be narrower. Is there a way to do this?
|
|
|
|