| Welcome, Guest |
You have to register before you can post on our site.
|
| Latest Threads |
Cropping Image
Forum: General questions
Last Post: rich2005
1 hour ago
» Replies: 1
» Views: 30
|
Too many fonts - where ar...
Forum: General questions
Last Post: rich2005
2 hours ago
» Replies: 1
» Views: 85
|
Alivecolors
Forum: Other graphics software
Last Post: denzjos
3 hours ago
» Replies: 0
» Views: 31
|
gimp 3 and 8bf files
Forum: Extending the GIMP
Last Post: denzjos
Yesterday, 02:03 PM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 74
|
Preferences/Folders shows...
Forum: Gimp 2.99 & Gimp 3.0
Last Post: programmer_ceds
Yesterday, 10:08 AM
» Replies: 5
» Views: 3,022
|
Problems with AppImages.
Forum: Installation and usage
Last Post: teapot
12-23-2025, 07:45 PM
» Replies: 2
» Views: 344
|
Why am'I fighting with GI...
Forum: Linux and other Unixen
Last Post: NetWeeZurd
12-23-2025, 01:44 AM
» Replies: 2
» Views: 198
|
Can tooltip display time ...
Forum: Gimp 2.99 & Gimp 3.0
Last Post: NetWeeZurd
12-23-2025, 01:40 AM
» Replies: 4
» Views: 1,318
|
Problem posting an update...
Forum: Gimp-Forum.net
Last Post: Scallact
12-21-2025, 10:19 PM
» Replies: 19
» Views: 1,015
|
Paint bucket acts "weird"
Forum: General questions
Last Post: PieterJW
12-21-2025, 06:59 PM
» Replies: 7
» Views: 480
|
|
|
| 8-bit vs 16-bit Precision, and Indexing |
|
Posted by: Mango Turtl - 08-22-2021, 07:25 AM - Forum: General questions
- Replies (4)
|
 |
Just a couple questions that I can't seem to find the answer for online, so I figured I would ask here.
Online, it says that editing a photo with 8-bit precision is easier on a computer's RAM, and reduces file size. I have no trouble with RAM usage, and I shoot a lot of my photos in 16-bit RAW format, so I edit photos with that. However, I'm VERY interested in the reduced file size.
It seems to me that if I edit a photo in 16-bit and then convert it to 8-bit precision after I'm done, it still makes it may smaller in size...and flipping between 16-bit and 8-bit via the history tab, I can't see an actual difference. Does anyone know what actually happens to the photo if I switch to the 8-bit precision after I'm done editing? And what's the difference between just using 8-bit precision and using indexed colors, since I can see a VERY visible difference if I index the colors as well.
I'd really like to know how much information I'm losing if I switch to 8-bit precision, without indexing, after I'm already done editing the original 16-bit photo.
Thanks!
Edit: Looking at the colorcube analysis, both the original 16-bit and converted 8-bit PNGs have the same amount of unique colors. Obviously, the indexed version only has 256. Does this mean that if I don't index, no actual visible information is lost by converting it to 8-bit?
|
|
|
| Image disappears when I try to scale? |
|
Posted by: OurJud - 08-21-2021, 07:09 PM - Forum: General questions
- Replies (7)
|
 |
I don’t understand what I’m doing wrong all of a sudden. If I right click and copy and image from the net, then paste it as new image into Gimp, when I select the scale option from ‘Transform’ the image disappears and leaves me with that chequered background. I can see the selection lines of the image, and can change the size, but where’s the image??
|
|
|
|